Without fines, barking law still has no teeth
The Simi City Council and specifically Councilmember Glen Becerra blew it on the barking issue. No fines? There must be ramifications to the breaking of any rule or there is no rule; that makes sense, right?
The honor system is a no-go, as the owners of the offending animals tend to see their nontaxpaying pets as above the needs of human neighbors who wish only to enjoy the homes they work their butts off to live in.
When confronting one of my own bark-producing neighbors, I stated my argument thusly; if you had to hear any aspect of my life as often as I have to hear your dogs, it would be you complaining to me. They understood and have done something truly wacky—they trained their pets.
Sonic barking collars and yard monitors cause dogs no pain, train them quickly and cost very little. There is no reason beyond pure selfishness for people to force their neighbors to forgo their right to a quiet time in their backyard because of the alarming taunts of a barking dog.
And here’s one more thought: Barking dogs increase the carbon footprint. They are actually antienvironmental. If I can’t turn off my air conditioner and open my windows on a cool evening because the barking will invade my home, I burn more electricity. It costs me money and increases overall energy use.
If your dog is barking often enough to disturb your neighbors—and you know who you are—it’s time to exercise a little decency.
And, Mr. Becerra, if you’re not interested in protecting my interests as a homeowner, I will be reminded to vote against you every time I hear a dog bark.
Steve Ochs
Simi Valley


