Evolution a mathematical impossibility

Public schools throughout America are teaching the theory of evolution as though it were a scientifically proven fact. It is not.

The theory of evolution has been around for 150 years. Many models have been proposed including natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, catastrophes, a buildup of favorable mutations and more. Let’s look at some facts:

Fact No. 1: The second law of thermodynamics states that all things that have substance (amoebas, atoms, molecules, your brain, apples) will, if left alone, reduce to their lowest form. They will not increase in complexity or order but will decrease to simplicity or disorder. This law is proven fact. Evolution requires the exact opposite. Evolutionists have no explanation as to how this law may be set aside to allow for evolution.

Fact No. 2: If you could set aside the second law (you cannot) the odds of evolution taking place by pure chance are as follows:

For comparison, the California lottery picks six numbers out of 47. The numbers can come in any order. The odds of your picking them are 41,416,353 to 1.

To get 100 parts assembled in specific order, the odds are the number one followed by 158 zeroes. I do not know the name of that number. It takes only 12 zeroes to get a trillion.

According to NASA, the smallest molecule that would be considered rudimentary life has 400 distinct parts. These parts must assemble in precise order.

The number of seconds in 100 billion years is a one followed by 19 zeroes. There is not enough time in 100 billion years, trying once every second, to get just one useless 100 part molecule by chance. There is not enough time if you tried a billion times a second for 100 billion years. Not even close.

The evolutionist thinks that he can avoid the second law of thermodynamics and he can beat these odds. And beat them, a few billion times, in only 7 billion years.

If that isn’t enough, once we have rudimentary life, it must now mutate into higher forms until it arrives (so far) at us as the highest form. It will become billions of forms of life, from amoebas to mosquitoes to humans.

But we know that mutations are almost always negative and cause the organism to not work as well. We cannot find a true (favorable) mutation anywhere in the world. If you could get a buildup of favorable mutations the odds of it happening are about one with over a million zeroes. That is not an exaggeration.

There is not one shred of evidence for the theory of evolution. All scientific understanding says no. There is no missing link. There is not even proof that the universe is as old as the evolutionist says. Check it out.

A friend asked me why so many scientists say evolution is true if what I present here is true. I honestly do not know. It is baffling to me. There are a large number of scientists who do not accept this theory for the very reasons presented here.

Frank Bland

Simi Valley